The Killer Angels (Gettysburg) Essays - , Term Papers

The Killer Angels (Gettysburg) When an author writes a book he has a message that he is trying to get across to the reader. This message is called a theme. In The Killer Angels Shaara's theme was freedom for the slaves. The Northerners truly believed that the slaves deserved to be free, and their desire to set slaves free was the cause of the Civil War. Just before the Battle of Gettysburg, Colonel Lawrence Chamberlain of the 20th Maine gave a speech to a group of mutineers. He told them that the war in which they were fighting was unlike any war in history. The war in which they were fighting was not for money, property or power. It was a war to set other men free. After the battle began, Sergeant Tom Chamberlain asked a group of prisoners why they were fighting. They gave no answer, but asked him the same question. Sergeant Chamberlain answered, ?To free the slaves, of course.? The South, however, was against freeing the slaves. The entire Civil War, whether the people were for or against the idea, was about freedom. The Killer Angels was informative, very fascinating and I liked it. I liked the book because I learned many things from it. I'd never thought much about the importance of the Battle of Gettysburg until I read The Killer Angels. From this book I learned many things. I learned that the Battle of Gettysburg was the turning point of the Civil War. Prior to Gettysburg, the South had won most major battles. At Gettysburg, however, the North gained it's first major victory. From then on, the North continued to gain momentum, winning virtually every battle for the following two years of the war. The Battle of Gettysburg exhausted both armies; greatly decreasing their reserves of ammunition and soldiers. The North had more than twice as many men as the South, and since the North was industrialized, they could replenish their supplies of men and ammunition fairly quickly. The South, however, could not replenish their supplies quickly because of the lack of industrialization and manpower. The supplies lost in the Battle of Gettysburg ultimately lost the war for the South. I also learned that Confederate General Robert E. Lee was not a good military tactician. Evidently, he thought that, as in most of the previous battles, the Confederate army could win this one with a series of charges. On the second day of the Battle of Gettysburg, Lee ordered the first charge. In this charge, Confederate troops would make an uphill attack in an attempt to take a ridge from the Federal army. With an uphill advantage, the Federal troops drove the Confederate army into retreat. On the third day of battle, Lee ordered a charge that would take his army across more than a mile of open field. On the other side of the field, however, Federal troops released a continuous bombardment of artillery as the Confederate troops made their way across. The Federal army wiped out most of the Confederate troops before they were halfway across the field. By the time the remaining Confederates reached the Federal army their numbers were so small the Federal army had no trouble defeating them. A good commanding general would have seen that both charges were hopeless. In both cases the Federal troops had fortified vantage points, while the Confederate army had no sufficient protection. Had Lee seen this, he would not have ordered the charges. Instead, he was too confident of the ability of his army and his overconfidence led him to defeat. Before I read The Killer Angels I knew that the Civil War brought many friends to fight against friends and family to fight against family. Until I read The Killer Angels, I never realized that this was true even in the higher ranks. General Hancock of the Federal army and General Armistad of the Confederate were extremely good friends. Before the war they served together in California, but when they war began they parted ways. Throughout the Battle of Gettysburg, both generals were constantly asking for permission to go under flag of truce to the opposing army hoping to see the other. During the battle both generals were wounded, and they never got another chance to see each other. General Armistad was mortally wounded, and in his dying words he asked a messenger to send his apologies to General Hancock that it had to end the way it did. The Civil War tore families and friends apart, all the

Peer Review of Authorship Ethics

Peer Review of Authorship Ethics The author demonstrates a fair understanding of the ethical issues associated with assigning authorship to a manuscript or scientific report. The author shows that establishing authorship is through building significant contribution to an article (Handyman 2011). The author also indicates that all authors named in a publication should play a substantial role in all the steps that are mandatory for publication of the work.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on Peer Review of Authorship Ethics specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More However, the author does not mention the critical area of fictitious authorship. Fictitious authorship occurs when a non participant takes authorship credit; when articles include forged results or include previously published information (â€Å"The imagined author† 2000, p.31). Fraud in scientific authorship is an area worth mentioning. The author ought to discuss this issue and give probable solutions. Subjecting authors to anonymous interviews to determine who did and who did not partake of the research beats logic if the actual work is counterfeit. The author proposes all the problems concerning authorship and possible resolutions as recommendations to the Research Integrity Officer of Melbourne University. The author suggests that the solutions apply to other institutions as well and probably as global paradigms for recognizing authorship. In all these recommendations, the author mentions responsibility, accountability, and transparency as the fundamental themes. The article demonstrates scholarship. The author comprehends the conventions of the scientific world well, hence demonstrating that they read into the subject. The author gives feasible solutions on how to avoid listing non participants as authors through conducting anonymous interviews. The author uses relevant examples to support ideas. For example, the author uses a movie analogy to demonstrate t he assigning of authorship to scientific works and gives examples of various types of authors in the paper. The author also uses detailed examples of help given to scientists in coming up with scientific publications (general bench work and writing examples).Advertising Looking for critical writing on ethics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The author states their own opinions regarding authorship. They state that an author is the main person behind the design, subject, and conception of a paper and that anybody else who adds value to a paper should be listed only as a helper. The author, however, acknowledges that it is rational to recognize these assistants. Adding a helpers’ list stating the names of all those individuals who contribute to the research project on the first page of the publication helps achieve recognition of the helpers. This article is of good quality. The article is well written. The intr oduction and conclusion are succinct. There is a smooth transition of ideas from one paragraph to the next. The author uses straightforward lingo that is easy to comprehend. There are no typographical errors in the paper. However, the paper has a few mistakes in grammar. For example, the author writes â€Å"practises† (verb) instead of â€Å"practices† (noun) in the sentence containing the words â€Å"knowledge practises.† The author makes punctuation errors, for example, the introductory phrases â€Å"On one side† and â€Å"On the other side† do not have commas after them. There is unnecessary capitalization of words like â€Å"how,† â€Å"what,† and â€Å"who† in the paper. References Handyman, K. J. 2011, Research tips – Authorship ethics. Web. â€Å"The imagined author† 2000, in Jones, A. H. McLellan, F (eds.), Medical issues in biomedical publications, JHU Press, Maryland, pp 31-35.

Andy's Recipe in Leadership Theory and Practice Case Study

Andy's Recipe in Leadership Theory and Practice - Case Study Example This fact shows that Andy has an excellent relation with his customers. An ability to relate well with customers is indeed a proven factor that contributes to success in business; this point is supported by Boynlon and Zmud in their article â€Å"An Assessment of Critical Success Factors†. In this article, Boynlon and Zmud argue that without skills in relating with customers well, one cannot expect substantial success in business. Thirdly, Andy’s restaurant business is successful because of Andy’s competent leadership skills. One of Andy’s main leadership qualities is his ability to deal with his employees (managers), despite their various weaknesses. All the three managers of his restaurant business, i.e. Kelly, Danielle, and Patrick, have weaknesses that affect their performance in the business, but, despite these weaknesses, Andy is able to deal with them and to coach and to teach them to be better leaders. Andy’s strategy of management is that f ocusing on the strength, rather than the weaknesses of his employees. Focusing on the strengths, rather, than the weaknesses of employees in business management is actually one of the best management models and it helps to prevent crisis between the managers and their employees (Daniel &Ronald, 1961). In the case study that we have read, we learn that helping people to become the best that they can is the goal of Andy for his restaurant employees. Andy’s focus and commitment on improving the leadership skills of his employees, therefore, is one of the main reasons behind Andy’s successful restaurant business. Lastly, Andy’s restaurant business is successful because of honesty and good ethics in business. In the case study that we have read, we learn that Andy does not engage in any unethical practice like raising the prices of his items unfairly, with a view of raising the profits of the business. Andy says in the case study that you succeed in business by being what you should be.

Project Management Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1

Project Management - Research Paper Example The process of project risk analysis is a subjective assessment that is based on the probability of failure to realize the set project objectives within the given time framework and resources allocated (Durkovic & Rakovic, 2009). The risk can occur during the inception, development, and finishing or implementation stage of the project. Briargrove must therefore consider performing an in-depth risk analysis in order to unearth the possible challenges that may hinder the success of the information system development, for the placement of necessary measures to ensure that the project is a success (Durkovic & Rakovic, 2009). The information development project involves three types of risks, that is, known risks, known risks with unknown consequences, and known risks. Known risks are well known to the project development team members and have a high probability of occurrence. ... Unclear definition of project goals, as from the start of the project, is likely to hinder the success of the project in the long run (Cox, 2009). There is a possible risk in poor definition of the project size, which is likely to take the project in the wrong direction and interfere with the time limit. The project plan must be clearly defined for clarity and scheduling within the specified time limit. Risks can be either internal or external, with internal risks being dependent on the team members, project nature, and available resources, whereas external risks entail legal or political influence of the project (Cox, 2009). Briargrove development team must be well aware of the current economic trends in budgeting for the project to ensure that the available resources are well allocated and evenly distributed throughout the project life cycle (Cox, 2009). Poor budgeting and resource allocation is fatal to the project in the case where the resources diminish before the project is com pleted, and there is lack of alternative source of money and other resources (Cox, 2009). The development tools to be used in the system development must be well-known to each of the development team members, and hence the selection of the team members must be a representation of diverse experience levels in the information development life cycle, which reduces the chances of project failure (Durkovic & Rakovic, 2009). Briargrove development team members must choose and agree on a suitable size and the complexity of the project for proper uninterrupted development cycle, which eliminates the possibility of time limit expiry that may require an addition of more time and resources (Durkovic & Rakovic, 2009). Briargrove must also identify probable hazards, potentially harmful phenomena or

Logistics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Logistics - Essay Example The effectiveness of logistic is improved through alliances with local suppliers that reduce cost of transportation. Porter (1985) asserts that logistics is key component of value chain that greatly facilitates business activities. In the company, technology is intrinsic part of strategy that facilitates inbound and outbound logistics for effective supply chain for raw material and network of distributors for finished goods. The parts are sent to offshore business partners where assembling is done and local transports are used to send the goods to dealers and stores. Thus, outsourcing partnership across the region significantly reduces transportation costs and helps gain competitive advantage in the current recessive environment. This saves time and effort as the assembling of products could be easily altered to suit the demands of the local customers across geographical boundaries. The products therefore, reach the customers timely and efficiently. Hence through creative logistic st rategy, the company is not only able to survive but is also able to maintain its market position. The use of technology facilitates improved communication and enhances efficiency in delivery of goods and services. Most importantly, good logistics has helped to expand business across the globe and provided the company with sustainable source of continuous income.

Thatcherism vs New Labour Party

Thatcherism vs New Labour Party The British political system went through various and complex changes over time, starting from the post-war consensus, going through Thatcherism and other parties policies activities and ending with the current government led by David Cameron. This research paper will mainly focus on the policies and the ideologies of both Margret Thatcher and the New Labor party and how they affected the British political life so far that is by its role definitely affected in the formation of the economic shape and clarified the peaks and troughs that represented a wide variety of aspects of life in the United Kingdom. Thatcherism is the political policies and way of government of Margaret Thatcher, which include privatisation, monetarism and lack of support for trade unions. Margret Thatcher was the prime minister of the United Kingdom during the period (1979-1990) and her nickname was the Iron Lady Her policies marked a special era for Britain at that time. The New Labour party is the alternative new branding name for the Labour party. This name was introduced by Tony Blair in a conference about a new life for Britain in 1994 and was put into action after the Labour party won the 1997 elections and stayed still till 2010. So whose policies were better? How were they perceived by the public? How did they manage to practice dominance over the British politics? The answers to these questions will be listed when we go through Thatcherism and New Labour policies, ideologies, activities and effects over the political and economic aspects in the United Kingdom and figure out their similarities and differences. Literature Review There is a book that described Margret Thatcher as the most exceptional woman in the history of politics in the United Kingdom. It talked about her achievements, early career and how she acquired power. It also focused on explaining how the Conservative party at that time, led my Thatcher, was able to defeat the Labour party in 4 consecutive general elections.  [1]   Another paper presented the challenges that shaped the policies of both Margret Thatcher and Tony Blair. It elaborated on the main issues that Margret Thatcher focused on like privatization and lack of support for trade unions. On the other hand, it mentioned the Manifesto on which the New Labour party fought on the 1997 elections pledged not to increase rates of income tax, and to hold public spending totals for the first two years in office to those planned by its predecessor  [2]   In another book, there was a clear explanation of how the New Labour party attempted to gain back power and confidence in voters relying on and adhering to some Thatcherism policies.  [3]   Another book elaborated mainly on how the Labour party recovered from the 4 major defeats on the hands of the Conservative one and what changes they introduced in their policies to help them achieve the new outcomes of regaining power to the Labour party.  [4]   One more book described the era of Margret Thatcher and illustrated what were the successes and failures during her period in office and how she was able to confront the uprising economic and social challenges at that time.  [5]   Now we should go deep into the main ideas, policies, ideologies and features of both Thatcherism and New Labour. The Ideological Orientation of Thatcherism New Labour Thatcherism was built upon: Classical Liberalism, which is concerned about the importance of individual freedom, and Conservatism, which is an advocate for the notions of national sovereignty, the traditional morals and the laissez-faire principles Thatcher developed her policies over time with her first government focusing on the reform of trade unions and monetary control (monetarism), the second focusing on privatisation and housing and the third focusing on the restoration of the welfare state in the UK.  [6]  . Considering the New Labour ideology, Blair made a decisive break away from Old Labours traditional political stance and he called it as the party of New Labour after becoming leader of the party in 1994. In policy terms, New Labour acted like the mediator between Old Labour, who was statist socialism (they believe to be too radical), and Thatcherism, which was strongly concerned by the principle of laissez-faire and individualism as stated above. So Blair accepted many of his predecessors ideas about: free trade, the retrieval of a successful and elastic labour market through capitalism and more individual self-help, etc.  [7]   There were some obvious similarities between Thatcherism and New Labour, which were even more important than the differences between both of them. The New Labour party adopted many key elements of the Conservative policies in order to overcome its harsh defeat and decline that was very sharp especially and directly after the winter of discontent. The Labour party in the 20th century didnt lose because of Thatcherism strength or popularity but because There was no great endorsement of Thatcherism in 1979. As late as October 1978, Labour was still ahead in some opinion polls, but the Winter of Discontent turned the public against Labour and the unions. The election was more of a rejection of Labour than an endorsement of Thatcherism  [8]   Similarities in The Policies Thatcher focused greatly on the economic reforming issue. She went through 4 main aspects and issues which are: the privatisation of the British Industrial methods, the narrowing of the union power and lack of support for it, the reduction of public spending in order to allow cuts in taxation and controlling the prices inflations. The New Labour was able to move away from the past when it declared the refusal and denial of the Clause IV from its constitution, which had become a keystone in the philosophy of the left. Commitment to public ownership was replaced by the view that the enterprise of the market and the rigour of competition are joined with the forces of partnership and co-operation to produce the wealth the nation needs and the opportunity for all to work and prosper. This marked the clear refusal by the New Labour for Socialism and marked its clear movement towards Thatcherism.  [9]   Considering the issue of taxation for instance, Gordon Brown made a clear and public commitment to remain within the Conservatives spending plans for the first two years of a new Parliament and not to increase the basic rate of income tax, showing again the adoption by New Labour of a key element of Conservative policy and also that was the Manifesto on which the New Labour party fought the 1997 elections.  [10]   It seems that New Labours economic policy is built upon a similar or a close one to that of Thatcher economic policy, where there is close-working relationship between the government and employers and trade union power was reduced and lacked significantly. It is also built upon the explicit endorsement of the importance of market competition and the desirability of private enterprise which is very close to the privatization policy by Thatcher. This policy shift is thought by many to represent a considerable acceptance of the broad legacy of the Thatcher years by Blair. Therefore it is evident that on these key issues, New Labour seemed to want to stay with the Thatcherism policies already put in place.  [11]   Differences in The Policies Government Intervention in the Market There were also clear differences in the economic policies of both Thatcherism and New Labour. For instance, New Labour refused Thatchers principle of Laissez-faire principle where the role of government and its intervention hardly featured. In accordance with this principle, Gordon Brown claimed that the government intervention is a must to provide more public services which will be more beneficial than cutting taxes for few people only. The New Labour party believed that its the duty of the government to interfere to prevent the under-investment of education and training that may take place in case of they relied only on the market forces alone. So they sustained investment in skills, science, research and development, and public infrastructure encouraged strong performance in high-value manufacturing sectors far removed from financial markets in the UK  [12]   Taxation Policy The difference between Thatcherism and New Labour can also be seen when we look at the taxation policy. Thatcher believed in the motivation for low rates of direct taxation and she regarded this as a key part of her strategy of increasing competitiveness. Thatcherism also believed that direct cuts in taxations will help set the values of equality and the individual freedom in order to reach the welfare state. However, the New Labour was obliged to work according to 1997 elections manifesto where the government should not increase its public spending for the first two years of its formation. This manifesto briefly stated that the officials in Blairs government should be Wise spenders, not big spenders Blair always believed that its not wise or rational to increase taxations because it will dangerously harm the economic situation and because the New Labour was more concerned with the likely vote-losing consequences of high taxation. However there were two contradicting opinions about t he tax increase issue, one suggest by Blair and the other by Brown. Brown believed that Labour should retain the power to raise the top rate however, Blair and his advocates argued that increasing taxation rates is not the best guaranteed method to gain revenues: to put up rates would not automatically achieve the desired result as evasion will increase  [13]   The Social Welfare Equality Social welfare policy marked an obvious difference point between Thatcherism and the New Labour. New Labour believed in communitarianism which is the existence of society with networks of social relations. New Labour used the term Positivity of Freedom where people can get their chance to do things they need to do which are available for them through various resources, and the government intervention to provide these resources. New Labour didnt ignore the socially excluded persons, it helped them empower and fill the lack of positive freedom and it made sure that everybody came out beneficial from economic growths.  [14]   The New Labour also marked unemployment as the biggest brick that forms inequality between people and according to Blair, the best guarantee to earn a decent wage was employability The New Labour believed in the importance of coping with the world changing process towards information age and in order to develop more and more, they sought a society full of employed, skilled and trained workers so they tended to provide resources for people in order to achieve that development and progress goal.  [15]   On the other side, Thatcherism advocated for individualism and individual responsibility in place of collective provision and availability as stated in the ideologies part above ( The individual is the one who is responsible for welfare, not the society) resulting in limiting the role of the welfare state and New Labour refused this vision because they believed it would increase the internal divisions of the society and weaken the bonds between people although Blair was adhered to Thatcherism one of whose aims was to shift responsibility for welfare from state to individual at the beginning considering the issue of equality.  [16]   Dealing with the Electorate and the Voting Class Another obvious and big difference between Thatcherism and New Labour is about how both of them dealt with the electorate. Margaret Thatcher preferred to convince the electorate to support her ideas and far sighting (to persuade them to accept her vision as it is) while New Labour tended to adapt their policies and regulations according to the voters visions and ideas, not the party itself and that is because the continuous processes of social change were tending to reduce the numbers of voters who favoured the government interventionist policies where the working labour class was gradually shrinking and getting oppressed while the middle classes who get paid for their work were expanding.  [17]   So its clear that the New Labour party introduced vast modifications to their policies considering the electorate issue and they adopted Thatchers method in order to win back the votes of people who lost confidence in them after the winter of discontent and to appeal to their new electoral target of middle income, middle Britain. So its pretty obvious that, although similarities of ideas and policies towards many political issues are crystal-clear between New Labour and the Thatcherism, these similarities acted as the outcome of New Labour belief in the importance of getting confidence and trust back towards the voting class. Then it could be said that the differences are actually more important than the similarities as they reflect the true nature of the ideologies of the parties and how they acted to achieve their main purposes and goals. Conclusion Its visibly noticeable about what we have been through along this study that The New Labour party has rose up at the ruins of Thatcherism, or in other terms, The New Labour has picked up where Thatcherism fell off. No one can deny that the New Labour did really benefit from Thatcherism dominance from 1979 to 1997. Margret Thatcher was able to lead its party to three decisive consecutive victories in general elections followed by the fourth success led by Major. The reasons of Thatcherism dominance over the British political life didnt rise up from nothing. They rose up thanks to Thatchers policies and regulations. The people admired what Thatcher did considering the hindering of government intervention in the stock market, privatizing British factories and companies, direct cuts in taxations and much more. Also, Thatchers economic policies played a leading role in getting favour and support from the electorate and the voters, some statistics about the effects of these economic policies, like a 32% increase in the number of workers in manufacturing, a 40% increase in household incomes, could prove that clear.  [18]   Nothing is perfect. Although Britain was a richer country under the Conservative government rule by Thatcher and there was surely an increase in the productivity (that was negative because more goods were produced by fewer workers rather than increased capital investment), inequality also spread into Britain. Unemployment for example had hit more than 4.5 million Britons and 1 million out of those 4.5 was never involved in any paid employment. One in six Britons were on social assistance, the highest proportion in the EU and three times the rate found in Germany  [19]   In overall, the majority of British people benefited from Thatcherism than suffered. Thatcher was able to create a country that was never formed under any Labour government rule before and this was successful mainly because of, as we mentioned before, Thatcherism policies especially the ones regarding economic issues. Thats what pushed the Labour party autonomously to follow the same footsteps left clearly by the Conservative one and they did that in order to win peoples confidence back into their party, attract the voters and to gain power again over the British political arena and that reason was like the green light to the birth of the New Labour party which had SIMILIARITIES along with Thatcherism (which prove that New Labour really picked up where Thatcherism fell off) and had DIFFERENCES (Which prove that the New Labour party is ideologically different from Thatcherism and it didnt copy or remake the latter steps, it did only follow the Conservatives in some specific points abo ut which they were pretty sure that it will get their glory and shine back again into Britain political field).

Process Essay - How to Get a Girl :: Process Essays

Every man’s dream is to have the perfect companion. However, in order to have one, you must first be able to get one. Most believe such a task can be extremely difficult, yet if done properly, it can be accomplished swiftly and efficiently. In fact, there are only a few basic procedures to getting a girl. The first step of this process is rather quite simple; get her attention. Initiating conversation is half the battle. As well, it is very effective to make frequent eye contact. Let her catch you staring once in a while and smile at every chance you get. Your goal is to be fairly subtle, while still making it obvious that you want her. Once you have succeeded in being noticed, you are ready for the next step. Be funny, be confident, but be yourself. The absolute worse thing you can do when trying to get a girl is to change your personality. Self-assurance is indispensable and by altering your character, you are telling her that you lack confidence. Having a sense of humor is also very important. It is absolutely crucial to make her smile, even if it occasionally requires making a fool of yourself. If you can’t make her laugh, you don’t stand a chance. Now that she’s interested, entice her by making her feel special. Without being too overwhelming, attempt to spend as much time as possible with her. Devote yourself to making her feel different than the rest by going out of your way to please her. Little things count most. For example, cancel a pre-planned weekend with the boys and take her out for dinner and a movie instead. Randomly buy her flowers and she will melt. Let her hear things she wants to hear. Compliment her hair or her outfit, but don’t go overboard. Too much of a good thing gets taken for granted. It’s also essential that you be interested, or pretend to be interested, in things she likes. If she plays sports watch her game, even in the pouring rain. Once she feels a little closer to you, it’s time for the final step. Probably the most difficult yet most important step to getting a girl is to keep her guessing. Although it sounds foolish, you must back off, tremendously. Play games with her head. Make her jealous by flirting with other girls, especially with her friends.